Main Article Content

Abstract

In this study, the cypsela features of eight Senecio species in Türkiye (Senecio olympicus Boiss., S. paludosus L., S. tauricolus VA. Matthews, S. salsuginea H. Duman & Vural, S. castagneanus DC., S. fluviatilis Wallr., S. pseudo-orientalis Schischk., and S. racemosus (M. Bieb.) DC.) were investigated in detail using light microscopy (LM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). A very thick and darkly stained cuticle layer was observed on the epidermal cells of all the species examined. Papillae were observed only in epidermal cells of S. olympicus Boiss, and sclerenchyma cells were less developed in the cypsela. In the other seven species, well-developed sclerenchyma tissue was found along the pericarp wall in the form of a semicircle, in bundles, or around the secretory ducts. Although secretion ducts were observed along the cypsela wall in the mid-layer cells of S. olympicus, S. tauricolus, S. castagneanus, and S. fluviatilis, no secretion ducts were observed in the other four species. Although prismatic calcium oxalate crystals were observed in the intermediate (mid) layer of S. tauricolus, S. castagneanus, and S. pseudo-orientalis, no crystals were found in the other five species. Phytomelanin ­accumulation was found in the schizogenic spaces between the outer and ­intermediate layers of S. olympicus, S. paludosus, S. tauricolus, S. castagneanus, S. pseudo-orientalis, and S. racemosus, but not in S. salsuginea and S. fluviatilis.

Keywords

Anatomy Cypsela Cytology Senecio L. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

Article Details

How to Cite
Nurhan Büyükkartal, H. (2026) “Ultrastructural features of cypselae in selected Senecio L. (Asteraceae) species”, Acta Botanica Croatica, 85(2), pp. 138–146. doi: 10.37427/botcro-2026-015.

References

  1. Anderberg, A., 1991: Taxonomy and phylogeny of the tribe Inuleae (Asteraceae). Plant Syst Evol 176,75 –123. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937947
  2. Bıswas, S., Jana, B.K., Bar, R., Mukherjee, S.K., 2014: Mıcro- morphology and anatomy of Cypselas in some specıes of Asteraceae by LM and SEM. Int J Pharm Res Bio-Sci 3(4),143 –159.
  3. Bozkurt, M., Uysal, T., Hamzaoğlu, E., 2024: A phylogenetic analysis and delimitation of Turanecio (Asteraceae: Senecioneae). Turk J Bot 48(1), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-008X.2792
  4. Büyükkartal, H.N., Çölgeçen, H., Budak, Ü., 2017: Stem and leaf anatomy and achene structure in some species of Senecio (Asteraceae). Ann Plant Sci 6(12), 1845 –1854. https://doi.org/ 710.21746/aps.2017.6.12.7
  5. Büyükkartal, H.N., Çölgeçen, H., Budak, Ü., 2018: Achene ultrastructure in some species of Senecio (Asteraceae). IJPS 7 (1), 32–41.
  6. De-Paula, O.C., Marzinek, J., Oliveira, D.M.T., Machado, S.R., 2013: The role of fibres and the hypodermis in Compositae melanin secretion. Micron 44, 312–316. https://doi.org/ 710.1016/j.micron.2012.08.003
  7. Funk, V.A., Susanna, A., Stuessy, T.F., Robinson, H., 2009: Classification of Compositae. In: Systematics, evolution, and biogeography of Compositae. In: Funk, VA, Susanna A, Stuessy TF, Bayer RJ (eds), International Association for Plant Taxonomy, 171–189. Austria.
  8. Freitas, F.S., De-Paula, O.C., Nakajima, J.N., Marzinek, J., 2015: Fruits of Heterocoma (Vernonieae-Lychnophorinae): Taxonomic significance and a new pattern of phytomelanin deposition in Asteraceae. Bot J Linn Soc 179 (2), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12324
  9. Hamzaoğlu, E., Çetin, T., 2016: Contributions to the taxonomy and distribution of the genus Turanecio (Asteraceae, Senecioneae). Biol Divers Conserv 9 (1), 76–81.
  10. Jana, B.K., Mukherjee, S.K., 2014: Morpho-Anatomical features of cypselas in some species of the tribe Coreopsideae (Asteraceae). J Swamy Bot Club 31, 67 –72.
  11. Jeffrey, C.H., 2009: Evolution of Compositae flowers. In: Funk VA, Susanna A, Stuessy TF, Bayer RJ (eds), Systematics, Evolution and Biogeography of the Compositae, International Association for Plant Taxonomy, 132 –138. Vienna, Austria.
  12. Judd, W.S., Campbell, C.S., Kellogg, E.A., Stevens, P.F., Donoghue, M.J., 2002: Plant Systematics: A Phylogenetic Approach. 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, United States.
  13. Karanovi´c, D., Zori´c, L., Zlatkovi´c, B., Boˇza, P., Lukovi´c, J., 2016: Carpological and receptacular morpho-anatomical characters of Inula, Dittrichia, Limbarda and Pulicaria species (Compositae, Inuleae): Taxonomic implications. Flora 219, 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2016.01.001
  14. Kürşat, M., Çeltik, İ., Başer, B., Özbey, F., Emre, İ., 2023: Pollen morphology of some Tanacetum L. (Asteraceae) taxa and its systematic value. Turk J Bot 47(5), 372–387. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-008X.2775
  15. Leszek, B., Marek, P., 2013: A Study on Achene Macro and Mıcromorphologıcal Characters of Polısh specıes of the Senecio jacobaea Group. Acta Agrobot 66(2),13–20. https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2013.017
  16. Luft, J.H., 1961: Improvements in epoxy resin embedding methods. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 9(29), 409.
  17. Mandel, J.R., Dikow, R.B., Siniscalchi, C.M., Thapa, R., Watson, L.E., Funk, V.A., 2019: A fully resolved backboen phylogeny reveals numerous dispersals and explosive diversifications throughtou the history of Asteraceae. PNAS 116(28),14083–14088. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1903871116
  18. Marques, D., Marzinek, J., De-Paula, O.C., 2021: A new report of phytomelanin in cypselae of Vernonieae: the case of the type species of Lychnophora Mart. AABC 93(4), 4 – 6. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202120210204
  19. Marques, D., Bueno, V.R., Teles, A.M., 2022: Systematic significance of cypselae in the Calea teucriifolia complex. Phytotaxa 577(1), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.11646/ phytotaxa.577.1.6
  20. Marzinek, J., De-Paula, O.C., Oliveira, D.M.T., 2008: Cypsela or achene? Refining terminology by considering anatomical and historical factors. Rev Bras Bot 31, 549–553. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-84042008000300018
  21. Naderıfar, M., Sonbolı, A., Kazempour, O.S., 2023: Tanacetum isfahanicum (Compositae-Anthemideae), a new species from Iran and its phylogenetic position based on nrDNA ITS data. Turk J Bot 47(4), 323 –330. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-008X.2769
  22. Nordenstam, B., 2007: Tribe Senecioneae Cass. In: Kadereit JW, Jeffrey C (eds), The families and genera of vascular plants VIII, 208–245. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Verlag.
  23. Özcan, M., 2017: Cypsela micromorphology and anatomy in Cirsium sect. Epitrachys (Asteraceae, Carduoideae) and its taxonomic implications. Nord J Bot 35, 653–668. https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.01670
  24. Pandey, A.K., Stuessy, T.F., Mathur, R.R., 2014: Phytomelanin and Systematics of the Heliantheae Alliance (Compositae). PDE 131, 145 –165. https://doi.org/10.1127/1869-6155/2014/0131-0077
  25. Paul, S., 2017: Morphological and Anatomical Features among the Two Cypselae of the Family Compositae. J Plant Sci Agri Res 2(1), 007.
  26. Paul, S., Mukherjee, S.K., 2017: Diversity of Cypselar Features in Some Species of the Tribe Heliantheae, Family Compositae. Asian J Plant Sci Res 7 (5),1–9.
  27. Pelser, P.B., Nordenstam, B., Kadereit J.W., Watson L.E., 2007: An ITS phylogeny of tribe Senecioneae (Asteraceae) and a new delimitation of Senecio L. Taxon 56, 1077–1104. https://doi.org/10.2307/25065905
  28. Reis, A.R.S., Freitas, A.D.D., Leao, N.V.M., Santos-Filho, G., 2016: Morphological aspects of fruits, seeds and seedlings and anatomy of seedlings of Apuleia molaris spruce ex Benth. J Seed Sci 38(2),118 –128. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1545v38n2158472
  29. Roth, I., 1977: Fruits of Angiosperms. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.
  30. Sato, J.E., 1967: A modified method for bad staining of thin sections. J Electron Micros 16:133.
  31. Shil, A., Sobhan, K.R., Mukherjee, S.B., 2016: Dıversıty of cypselar anatomy in nine species of the trıbe Anthemıdeae (Asteraceae). JPS 5 (3), 95–105 https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16660.50561
  32. Soares, R.N., dos Santos, R.O., da Silva e Silva, B.M., 2019: Morphological aspects and anatomy of the fruit, seeds and seedlings of Pentaclethra macroloba (willd.) Kuntze (Fabaceae). J Seed Sci 41(4), 452 – 460. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1545v41n4222721
  33. Sukhorukov, A.P., Nılova, M.V., 2015: Carpology of the genus Tragopogon L. (Asteraceae) Phytotaxa 201 (1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.201.1.2
  34. Stempak, J.G., Ward, R.T., 1964: Ward. An improved staining method for electron microscopy. J Cell Biol 22, 697.
  35. Talukdar, T., 2015a: Cypselas Diversity as Novel Taxonomic Marker in the Tribe Astereae (Family Asteraceae). Emer Life Sci Res 1(2), 26 –34.
  36. Talukdar, T., 2015b: Comparative investigations on fruit microcharacters of four species of Hieracium L. (Asteraceae) and their taxonomic significance. Trop Plant Res 2(2), 156–167.
  37. Wiklund, A., 198: Ighermia, a new genus of the Asteraceae–Inuleae. Nord J Bot 3(4), 443 – 446. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.1983.tb01451.x
  38. Zareh, M.M., Faried A.M., Mohamed M.H., 2016: Achene wall anatomy and surface sculpturing of Launaea Cass. (Compositae: Cichorieae) with notes on their systematic significance. KJPT 46(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2016.46.2.187
  39. Zarembo, E.V., Boyko E.V., 2008: Carpology of some East Asian Cardueae (Asteraceae). Anales Jard Bot Madrid 65(1), 129 –134. https://doi.org/10.3989/ajbm.2008.v65.i1.250
  40. Zhu, S.X., Qin H.N. , Shih C., 2006: Achene wall anatomy and surface sculpturing of Lactuca L. and related genera (Compositae: Lactuceae) with notes on their systematic significance. J Integr Plant Biol 48 (4), 390 –399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2006.00245.x

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.